Magicseaweed Logo
Profile Page  ADD SPOT   Profile Page  PROFILE   Log In  LOG IN

BA Ban Crash Lands! » Acceptance of a failed policy

By Ed Magicseaweed - Published on 21st September 2009 | Viewed 15923 times.

Related Content
News Image
NICO von Rupp is a German / Portuguese surfer living in Praia Grande, close to Lisbon, Portugal.
News Image
SOUTH of the Border, Vol. 2, follows Lyndon Wake, Andrew Cotton and Tom Butler during a very average month of surf in Ireland.
News Image
BRUCE Irons surfs solid Teahupoo blindfolded, proving that ability and instinct transcend vision.
View Next Page 1 2 View Next Page
[PT-Acceptance of a failed policy]


One company with the right idea ... Virgin© 2009 - Virgin Atlantic

AFTER two years of campaigning British Airways has reversed its ban on surfboard carriage. Famous for its strapline "The World's Favourite Airline", in 2007, British Airways became surfers least favourite airline and garnered innumerable lines of bad press as it banned the carriage of all surfboards. Originally starting out as a campaign on Facebook, by yours truly, the campaign garnered international headlines and ended up with a march on Parliament led by the British Surfing Association. An Early Day Motion was actually presented to the house itself by David Davies MP, a keen surfer.

Most amusing was a tongue-in-cheek campaign run by the ever populist and bandwagon-jumping, Virgin Atlantic, likening British Airways to the stage play, No Sex Please, We're British.

Now surfboards and water skis have been allowed back on board, up to a maximum length of 190cm/75inches or 6'.3", if you round it up. Congratulations have to go to British Airways for coming to their senses and allowing boards to be carried - but not everyone rides a 6'.3" (plus the length of bag or packing) - in effect it is unlikely you would be able to carry more than a 6'.1" plus bubble-wrap. Width restrictions are 29.5inches or 75cm so the widest fish will be acceptable.

Unfortunately longboards and minimals are still banned but you can bring your ripper board and a fat fish, allowing you to surf most waves. Those of you stuck on the logs perhaps it's time to make your protest? Willie Walsh we salute you for this gesture but it is not enough. Why only go this far?

BA recently published an annual loss of £401m, whereas Virgin (who are delighted to carry surfboards) almost doubled their profits and partially this has to be resultant of the success of the campaign. Virgin in response to the campaign released a set of adverts targeting surfers with the strap-line: "No Sex Wax please, we're British Airways".

The original Facebook group is still going HERE as is the BSA petition HERE so get on board if you fancy registering your frustration at BA's partial lifting of the ban.
Rate this article: 1 2 3 4 5
This article has been given an average rating of 3.61 from 687 votes.
Comments
 
Archived Comments
milhousedj864 days ago +1 Rating Rate Positive Rate Negative
I think BA is rotten like many big companies in UK. Have you heard about the new seat policy - you will be paying extra to have window seat. Not even low cost airlines do that. This will start from Oct 7th. Restriction to 6.3 is probably because some genius who designed luggage system at Terminal 5. As far as I'm concerned, I may be good enough to ride a 5.8 but what if I simply want to carry a different one? I can't believe I'm reading some people cheer the decision. I would prefer to keep blaming BA without someone telling me "eh come on, if you want you can carry a skimboard..."
calumn867 days ago -3 Rating Rate Positive Rate Negative
Mate thats great, i thought i'd never fly with them again but now i might. not too long ago i wasn't aware of their anti surfboards policy, not a great state of mind when standing in jo'burg trying to fly home with them. ended up asking everybody in the virgin queue to same destination if they would take my surfboard with them. some lovely old couple from durban took it for me and i just met them at heathrow with it. worst and greatest day ever
CI_Doyle869 days ago -2 Rating Rate Positive Rate Negative
Hey Guys, Afraid to say it, but better read the fine print..... sure you could get your 6'0 on board in it's boardbag (just)..... but only one board... check out the costs of additional ones. Same applies to bags and normal luggage... BA along with most major airlines are updating their baggage policies, and it's about to start geting expensive for everyone. you'd think that if you bought a ticket from them, then luggage is just part and parcel of a long haul flyer??? Apparently not... and this is all happening on the back of RyanAir's announcement that they made £500million (you read correctly!) from these supplementary charges i.e baggage, checking in at the airport, selecting your own seat, food, drink. Start saving those pennies! p.s. anyone know a surfboard friendly airline who fly direct to NZ?
coastroad869 days ago -1 Rating Rate Positive Rate Negative
Air New Zealand last time I flew (June09) No extra charge for 6'3". Take note you greedy BA wankers!
timb866 days ago +2 Rating Rate Positive Rate Negative
When I flew to NZ I took a double board bag with a 6'9" and a 6'2" with Air New Zealand for nothing, thats why I flew with them, they were real careful with it too !
windlesham869 days ago -1 Rating Rate Positive Rate Negative
Well done BA for having the balls to reverse an silly policy. Don't know why they get so much abuse here as they're prob one of the last remaining airlines who don't charge extra for the carriage of luggage/surf-boards. I'll defo fly with them cause i think they're a great airline.
Tonybye870 days ago -2 Rating Rate Positive Rate Negative
Paybacks are tough,serve them right, i will never use them again and spend my annual £4k+ surf budget on other airlines. They had the chance and greed got in the way. Not so funny now is it Mr walsh.
dza4mile871 days ago +1 Rating Rate Positive Rate Negative
its just them admitting their fault but not really wanting to do anything to correct it. i would rather a virgin anyday
litmus871 days ago +2 Rating Rate Positive Rate Negative
IM NEVER GOING TO FLY B.A AGAIN EVER ,I WOUID SOONER PADDLE TO ENGLAND THAN GO WITH THEM.........
Boardom871 days ago -1 Rating Rate Positive Rate Negative
Surely that´s a violation of my equal rights, I´m 6ft 4 inches and ride shortboards of 6´6 to 7´0....short people can surf tall ones can´t hey! Surfing is a heighist industry already, no one over 6ft can get boards in shops and now this.......
BigDan870 days ago +3 Rating Rate Positive Rate Negative
i agree, im 6ft 8 and because of this have to surf a bigger board. discrimination has a new air line.
Sneakybadger 872 days ago -1 Rating Rate Positive Rate Negative
Yeah thats the trouble really, i don't really know anyone who rides anything smaller than 6.1. Us spongers will be fine but come on BA, give a log a chance!
Mr P872 days ago +3 Rating Rate Positive Rate Negative
Sneakybadger 872 days ago -1 Rating Rate Positive Rate Negative
Agreed!
BrumSurfWann872 days ago +1 Rating Rate Positive Rate Negative
Glad the have admitted they are wrong, but disappointed at the restrictions still in place. I dont really ride anything that small (im 6'4, and 95kg!) so my boycott will continue!!
Jesse Rach-Sharpe868 days ago -2 Rating Rate Positive Rate Negative
its all about how you talk to the people at check in. They will take anything if you charm them a little bit. Fly in the winter and claim its a snowboard.
milhousedj864 days ago +1 Rating Rate Positive Rate Negative
I know someone who claimed it was a set of clubs and pretended me to believe he got away with it!
 
 About MSW  Our Shop Friends  Legal
Home
Site Map
Advertise
Support
Surf Shop
Surfboards
Xcel Wetsuits
Leashes
Tailpads
Go Pro Camera HD
Surf DVDs
Boardbags
Roofracks
Surf Books
Surfwax
Ding Repair
FCS Fins
Longboard Fins
Posters and Prints
Balance Boards
Mambo Clothing
Learn to Surf
All content remains copyright of Metcentral Ltd unless stated otherwise, we'd kindly ask that you don't reproduce it in any form without our permission.

Total Time 0.1339