as usual - differences between 'real feet' and 'surfers feet' get the better of discussion: I think borth surf rat is trying to point out that the faces appear as 'literal' 10 foot, whilst borthsucks is saying that the 'surfers foot' size is 4 foot (measured from the back of the wave size which is course is phenomenally smaller than the face ranges - which as a point also vary depending on the individual... feck, and I now I sound like an analytical anus - oh well...
Dude have you any idea how big 4ft is? There are only 12inches in 1ft you nugget. If you reckon that wave was nowhere near 4ft or in other words 48inches then you need your head checkin'. They guy surfing must be near average height for a British male. Which if you check is 5' 9". Or to confuse you even more, 69inches. So that wave has to be at least somewhere between 5 and 6ft, as the exact height of the surfer is unknown. by you stating that the wave is "NO WAY" 4ft, then i can only assume that you think this is some kind of dwarf surfer?
Borth Surf Rat1545 days ago
